Monday, February 8, 2010

Since there was no weapons of mass destruction,,,,how come nobody was arrested for making a false statement?

This is a big decision ,,,people were killed,,,trillions of dollars were spent ,,,etc etc etcSince there was no weapons of mass destruction,,,,how come nobody was arrested for making a false statement?
yes thousand of innasent people were killed for what nothing i think blair and bush should be brought up for umanaterian crimes aganst the people of iraq and making fals allagation and invading their country so my apinon is bush and blair are liers there was no mas wepon of distuction ever foundSince there was no weapons of mass destruction,,,,how come nobody was arrested for making a false statement?
Being wrong/mistaken is not a crime.
Bad intelligence does not constitute a false statement. For example, if you watched your neighbor's house for a week straight 24/7 and everyday you saw people carrying what looked like weapons cases and rolled bloody carpets in, but never coming out. Not to mention you've got one of your buddies on the inside letting you know what's in those cases and those rolled up carpets. What would you conclude? Probably that something was amist!! But when you finally decide to due something about it...kick in the door... and stop the crimes you are certain are going on....They've moved everything out when you and your buddy are sleep; over one state...known as Iran. Should you be punished? Because all arrows and fingers pointed to the obvious. Probably not...human intelligence means you have human error.
Well then you have to prosecute Johnson, Truman, FDR, wilson and McKinley, should we dig them up.
Who are you going to arrest? Everybody? Most in the US believed it. Including Russia and England and for that matter, most of the free world.
There was weopons of mass destruction and the US found them
Well that would mean we would have to arrest bill clinton and his administration..





Nice try
There were weapons of mass destruction. He gassed the Kurds


in the North of Iraq. He used gas in the Iran-Iraq war. But we blew most of them up in 1991. So he did have weapons of mass destruction at one time so it was not a lie.
I have em right here


*flexes arms*
there was wmd's i was in iraq and was in a spec op's RECON unit and was hit with mustard gas and found a bunch of bunkers with the chit in it...not really what we were looking for but it was there and we did get hit so just cause they dont say everything that should be said dosnt mean it didnt happ'n


maybe if you want real answers you should ask real soldiers not the local new's crew. not your fault for not knowing. thank u
Call Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson , they will have someone hung for it
Because being wrong is not a lie.
stop listening and repeating idiots
well not trillions of dollars but there were WMD's not nukes but chemical weapons and sadams initial resistance to UN made him suspisious and the WMD's were gasses and bio weapons that he used to exicute towns of people.
Wow. Only five answers and already someone has repeated the lie about having found weapons of mass destruction.
Give it a rest please
Saddam used weapons of mass destruction on his own people! If 50 people witnessed a man kill a person in the middle of the day would the police be wrong for arresting the man the next day even if they can't find the gun? Of course they wouldn't. We warned Saddam that we were coming in plenty of time for him to get rid of his weapons, but even if he didn't have them, he said he did. That is enough! end of story! move on! The fact that we are still being attacked over there is proof that we made the right move.
Blame the cowardly media. Bush/Rove %26amp; Co. trashed and intimidated them. The general public didn't start to get the truth until 2005.
they are there, just not found yet ! they do have them stashed somewhere !
  • short hair cut
  • No comments:

    Post a Comment